Noel, On 09 Aug 2012, at 22:26, [email protected] (Noel Chiappa) wrote:
>> From: Damien Saucez <[email protected]> > >> However, we observe a much more variable delay now with DDT than before >> where delays were very stable with time. > > Is this variation for a single MR<->{something} interaction, or is this the > overall time from i) an ITR needing a mappping to ii) it getting the mapping? > If the latter, it makes sense that there is more variation. It's the average delay among all the EID retrieved at the given time from the vantage point. > > Previously, the Map-Request was sent over the ALT (via the ALT's root, in > almost all cases) to the ETR, and then the reply came back. Not a lot to vary > there (although the path from the root to the Map-Server would vary a bit). > > Now, depending on how the delegation tree is configured (i.e. how many layers > from the root to the Map-Server for the mapping in question), how many of > those delegations are cached in the Map-Resolver the ITR is talking to, etc > you would expect to see a certain amount of variation. > agree, we therefore need to figure out where to place DDT nodes, how much the (root) nodes must be replicated, and how deep the tree must be to achieve stable and low delays. Damien Saucez > Noel _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
