I view that there is consensus in the workgroup to adopt these drafts as work group items.
Can the authors please submit a revision in the appropriate fashion. I'd also like to remind the authors that as a WG document I am expecting that any substantive document changes are the result of WG discussion. Cheers Terry On 13/08/12 4:08 PM, "Terry Manderson" <[email protected]> wrote: > RE: LISP-Architecture & LISP-Introduction > > As you are aware, in Vancouver the chairs received a request for the > following documents to be adopted as WG items. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chiappa-lisp-architecture-01 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chiappa-lisp-introduction-01 > > I would like to note that these two documents, if adopted, would satisfy the > following charter item: > > - Architecture description: This document will describe the > architecture of the entire LISP system, making it easier to read the > rest of the LISP specifications and providing a basis for discussion > about the details of the LISP protocols. The document will include > a description of the cache management and ETR synchronization > essential characteristics needed to ensure the correct operation > of the protocol. > > Here starts a 14 day call for adoption, the this call will end on > Tuesday the 28th August, 2012. > > Please email the WG list stating that you either accept, or not accept, the > item. > > If you email to support the acceptance of these documents as a WG item, > please also indicate if you are able and willing to either contribute to, or > review, (or both) the drafts. > > Sitting in silence does not indicate support, please respond appropriately. > > Cheers > Terry >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
