Hi Brian, thanks for your reply.
Agreed on the 2119 language. I will delete it and go back on normal language. I understand as well that the text concerning the prefix size needs to be somehow improved. Will do both. On 31 Aug. 2012, at 20:11 , Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: [snip] > > >> >> In addition, I know that all LISP work is marked as "experimental" >> but let's also keep in mind that there are companies out there that >> start making business out of LISP. >> > > That is their choice. True, but would be better to not penalise them. They are helping in gaining knowledge on new technology. > >> >>> Should there be a termination date for this allocation? >> >> I do not see IPv6 addressing space as a scarce resource, and for the >> same reasons I cited above I wouldn't put a termination date. >> >> Obviously, IANA may decide to allocate the prefix only for a limited >> amount of time and decide in few years whether or not to make it a >> definitive allocation. >> > > That is definitely one possibility. > Which the current draft does not prevent. Thanks again. Luigi > Regards, > Brian _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
