The NANOG list was talking about shared address space for a while and if the widespread deployment of this RFC were to take off, it seems to have some consequences for LISP as with shared address space:
* RLOCs could multiple identities, depending on which side of the CGN on falls on, * as well as the possibility of overlapping identities across providers. There must be some existing uses for LISP, maybe with LISP-mobile-node where this need to deal with NAT been already been addressed.
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
