Hi Noel, Thank you very much for your reply. Yes, I agree. If "NAT Traversal" is not based on RTR, "Destination Port" is indeed a problem.
[email protected] (Noel Chiappa) 写于 2012-11-02 11:52:47: > > From: [email protected] > > > Consider the scenario that two ETRs behind a single NAT. > > > When NAT establish states for ETRs who both send packets outbound, it > > could assign different global IP addresses for them. > > Most NAT devices (at least, IPv4 NAT devices) share a _single_ global IP > address among multiple machines. So, the NAT _cannot_ "assign [a] different > global IP address[] for" each ETR. > > Noel -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited. If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
