Hi, Ack.
Should we issue a new version of the document now or wait after the closure of the LC? L. On 14 Dec. 2012, at 17:27 , Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, your action would be to remove the DDT material from this document. > The question of how the DDT spec handles having sufficient security > discussion is a separate matter. > > Yours, > Joel > > On 12/14/2012 6:01 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: >> Hi Joel, >> >> I've got your point. >> >> Your suggestion is to take out the DDT section and put it in the DDT >> document (right?). >> >> For the first part (take it out from this doc) I have no problems. For the >> second part (put it in the DDT doc) is up to the DDT authors, according with >> their plans for the document. >> (simplest solution is to cut & paste as it is ;-) ) >> >> ciao >> >> Luigi >> >> >> On 13 Dec. 2012, at 17:39 , Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thank you for responding to my comments. >>> With regard to the discussion of MS, ALT, and DDT, it seems to me that >>> there are a couple of reasons for splitting DDT out: >>> >>> 1) MS and ALT are already documented, and need better security description. >>> This seems the sensible place to fill that. IN contrast, the security >>> information for DDT can be included in that document. >>> >>> 2) In theory there can be yet other mapping systems. This document can not >>> deal with all future cases. >>> >>> I would like t be able to complete this short term deliverable without >>> making it dependent upon a long term deliverable. >>> >>> Yours, >>> Joel >>> >>> On 12/13/2012 3:27 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: >>>>>> I am wondering about the tradeoff of including DDT in this >>>>>> document. On the one hand, DDT is where we likely are going. On >>>>>> the other hand, including that material will mean that this >>>>>> document gets an RFC Editor hold until LISP DDT is published. >>>>>> Would it make more sense to defer the DDT specific section to the >>>>>> DDT document? >>>> Another good point but actually goes beyond DDT IMO. If we put ALT >>>> and MS make sense to me to put DDT as well. >>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
