Hi David,
At 19:04 03-03-2013, David Conrad wrote:
I agree that costs shouldn't be dictated. More specifically, I don't
think the draft should get into how the service is funded other than
to say the allocation service can't charge more than the cost to
provide the service.
The draft is getting into funding by saying that. I don't know what
will happen to the above. There has been what I could describe as,
technically, violations of what's written in some old
documents. Sorry, I cannot provide any details.
EID allocation is a one-time service, but to meet requirements like
global uniqueness and providing registration data via Whois (or
whatever), somebody has to maintain a database and a DNS server (if
rDNS is used) which is a continual service subject to a service
level commitment.
BTW, reverse DNS can be useful for operational purposes. I don't
have an opinion about whether reverse DNS is required.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
