On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Noel Chiappa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Again, I would _hope_ that if 'EID-only' addresses are DFZ-routed, they will > be so in a very restricted way (e.g. all ISP's filter out 'more specifics' in > this block, and the whole block anycast-routed to the nearest PITR) which > makes the unsuitble for 'backdoor PI space'. > > And maybe we should say that, in big letters, so people don't even _think_ > they can get 'backdoor PI space' that way.
If it is documented that 'EID-only' addresses are not intended to be traditionally routed, that might help significantly in limiting concerns about potential impact to existing operations (aka "policy issues") that might otherwise be posed by its issuance. FYI, /John Disclaimers: My views alone. Small topics herein; mental choking hazard. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
