Dino,
Do you agree that Options 1, 2 and 3 are all bad ideas?
Also, before I ask a dumb question, can you point me at something that I can
read that describes how the entry in Option 4 is used? If not, could you
provide some detail?
Ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:40 PM
> To: Ronald Bonica
> Cc: Damien Saucez; LISP mailing list list
> Subject: Re: [lisp] Need comments on LISP Threats Analysis
>
> > 1) pass each packet without verification
> > 2) query the map cache for each packet. If no entry exists, discard
> the packet and do not query the map server
> > 3) query the map cache for each packet. If no entry exists, discard
> the packet and query the map server
>
> 4) Create an entry in another data structure which is smaller and has
> compressed entries in it. So verification checks can be done quickly
> and less often the need to do MDB lookups.
>
> Dino
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
