On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > 1) We need to be clear about which LCAFs can be used as EIDs, which as RLOC, > and which as both.
If we're not clear it will lead to confusing later on, or no deployment because no one know what todo. Another scenario are that we get issue to get different vendors to talk with each other.... and some more issues. All in all, either should all LCAF work for all cases, or some indicator, or some sort of table to indicate what can work where. <snip> > Note that this is separate from the question of whether an ETR using a > complex LCAF RLOC can reasonably expect the ITR to understand it. Either way we need a clear understanding of how LCAF are to be understood by different part of the systems. > Comments, opinions, or rotten tomatoes? what about onions?;) -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE [email protected] | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | [email protected] _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
