> I did consider alluding to n-tuple RLOCs as 'improvements in progress',
> in a different place, higher up the document (which would be the
> appropriate location for such an observation), but I decided not to,
> because it just opens up too big a can of worms. Right at the moment
> that section's really simple and straight-forward, EIDs identify the
> hosts, RLOCs where they are, yadda-yadda, and I have to put in a * and
> say 'Well, except when RLOCs are lists', it's just too hairy.
So I lied. It turns out I do mention n-tuple RLOCs in the current version;
they are in "Mapping System".
Noel
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
