I have not been able to find a good reference to use for the earlier
adopters. Go without it. If I find one, we can add it. If someone
else wants a reference, they can suggest one.
Yours,
Joel
On 10/16/13 9:23 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
I'm still waiting for a couple of these:
> From: [email protected] (Noel Chiappa)
> During the review of the Intro document at the Interim, in a couple of
> places people said 'Oh we need a reference there, I'll get it to you
> later' - and I dutifully marked down that I needed to add a reference -
> but due to the time pressure, didn't write down who ..
>
> So if anyone was as the interim, and recognizes and of these (below) as
> something they were going to send me a reference for, can you please do
> so?
> "The term 'node' is used here as it used in the IPv6 work."
I really need this one, otherwise I'm going to have to delete the mention of
IPv6, and instead put a home-grown definition in the initial small glossary -
but nobody has responded saying they're going to provide it?
> "More importantly, this balance needs to hold for early adopters -
> because if they do not receive benefits to their adoption, the sphere
> of earliest adopters will not expand, and it will never get to
> widespread deployment."
And I need this one too...
Noel
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
