> Zero UDP checksums are being selected for convenience, without an appreciation > of the overall effects and costs on other traffic. I see this is occurring > in both tsvwg > and lisp, and it's probably happening elsewhere:
For the LISP working group, or at least for this author, Zero UDP checksums were selected out of practicality, performance practicality. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
