On 27 Jan 2014, at 20:04, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote:
> Assuming for the moment that the authors are willing, > is there support for making this a WG document? > Are there folks other than the authors who will undertake to review it? > Do folks believe it is an appropriate document for the WG to produce (rather > than sending it to the Independent Stream?) > I do believe this is an appropriate document for the WG to produce and will be happy to review it. Damien Saucez > Yours, > Joel, asking as chair > > On 1/27/14 1:55 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote: >> Draft draft-farinacci-lisp-rig-02.txt has been previously requested to be a >> working group document. There wasn't overwelming conscensus to do so, so its >> status was not changed for about a year or so. >> >> At this time I would like to request it to be a working group document (and >> to actually bring it to last-call). RIG is a tool that seems to be useful >> and many are using it to debug and monitor the DDT mapping database >> transport system (and have for some time now). >> >> I would like to ask the authors to move this to a working group docuemnt. >> >> Thanks, >> Dino >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >> > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
