On Feb 19, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Damien Saucez <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've always thought that the mapping system will have to have capacity to >> deal with broken clients, random LIG bots, and DoS attacks (just like, say, >> DNS does). This leads me to believe that over-engineering the management of >> sending map-requests on a given ITR will likely end up creating more >> complexity, and therefor fragility, in the implementation. >> > > That's a point we can discuss, but are you ready to accept packet loss? > At the end, a miss = a packet drop… "Screws fall out all the time, the world is an imperfect place." --John Bender Seriously though, I'm perfectly willing to accept packet loss, but I recognize that there may well be people who won't. -Darrel _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
