Joel,
This is probably just a glitch, but i requested to present
draft-hertoghs-lisp-mobility-use-cases-00 on february 14th.
Also, the LISP Secure Cloud extension draft by Freitas, Bellagamba and
Hertoghs appears twice on the agenda (which gives us some time to present
the above draft :-P)
Yves
On 24/02/14 23:49, "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Below is the agenda for the LISP session in London.
>Presenters, please get us the slides in advance.
>We will likely work through the 1620 - 1630 break, and happily let you
>go early if we can.
>
>Thank you,
>Joel and Terry
>
>CHAIR(s): Joel Halpern ( jmh AT joelhalpern.com )
> Terry Manderson ( Terry.Manderson AT icann.org )
>
>SECRETARY: Wassim Haddad ( wassim.haddad AT ericsson.com )
> Luigi Iannone ( [email protected] )
>
>AGENDA
>
>Session 1/2 (60 min)
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>MONDAY, March 03, 2014
>1520-1620, Session 1. 60 Mins
>
>Administration 5 minutes
> Halpern/Manderson
> - Jabber Scribe(s)
> - Blue Sheets
> - Agenda Bashing
> - Status reports for WG drafts
>
>
>o WG Draft updates
>
>- LISP Introduction
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-03
> 5 minutes
> Chairs
>
>- LISP Deployment Considerations
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-deployment-12
> 10 minutes
> D. Lewis
>
>- LISP Threats Analysis
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/lisp/draft-ietf-lisp-threats
> 10 minutes
> D. Saucez
>
>- LISP EID Block
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/lisp/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block
> 5 mins
> L. Iannone
>
>
>
>o Non WG Documents
>
>- LISP EID Block Management
> draft-iannone-eid-block-mgmnt
> 10 mins
> Luigi Iannone
>
>
>- LISP Control Plan Multicast Signaling
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-mr-signaling-00
> 15 mins
> Dino Farinacci
>
>
>
>
>Session 2/2 (60 min)
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>MONDAY, March 03, 2014
>1630-1730, Session 2. 60 Mins
>
>
>- LISP Data Plane Crypto
> Document to be submitted
> 20 mins
> Dino Farinacci
>
>- LISP Secure Hybrid Cloud Extensions
>
>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-freitas-bellagamba-lisp-hybrid-cloud-usecase-
>00.txt
> 15 mins??????
> Santiago Freitas
>
>- LISP DC Deployment
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-moreno-lisp-datacenter-deployment-00.txt
> 5 min
> Victor Moreno
>
>- LISP Secure Hybrid Cloud Extension
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-freitas-bellagamba-lisp-hybrid-cloud-useca
>se-00.txt
> 10 min
> P. Bellagamba
>
>
>- Open Mic
> 10 Min
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lisp mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
--- Begin Message ---
Dear LISP WG,
This is a new LISP Use Case draft, and this one is centered on how to use
LISP for a number of network-based mobility use cases. We¹d like to
request comments on this.
Terry/Joel, we¹d also like a 5 minute slot at IETF89 to present this use
case draft
Yves
On 14/02/14 18:12, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>A new version of I-D, draft-hertoghs-lisp-mobility-use-cases-00.txt
>has been successfully submitted by Yves Hertoghs and posted to the
>IETF repository.
>
>Name: draft-hertoghs-lisp-mobility-use-cases
>Revision: 00
>Title: End Host Mobility Use Cases for LISP
>Document date: 2014-02-14
>Group: Individual Submission
>Pages: 17
>URL:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hertoghs-lisp-mobility-use-cases
>-00.txt
>Status:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hertoghs-lisp-mobility-use-cases/
>Htmlized:
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hertoghs-lisp-mobility-use-cases-00
>
>
>Abstract:
> This memo proposes use cases for LISP in the area of end Host
> mobility. The applicability of end host mobility can be found in
> data centers, where Virtual Machines (VM's) can be moved freely from
> one physical server onto another physical server, independent of
> location, without having to change the IP/MAC-addresses inside those
> VMs, nor impacting traffic flows to and from those VMs. Wireless end
> hosts are another area of applicability. Although this draft will
> not address wireless end host mobility, most of the same principles
> apply.
>
> Traditionally L2 extension technologies have been used to handle
> mobility events, but they could lead to suboptimal routing of traffic
> to and from the end host after the mobility event, as well as created
> big broadcast domains. This memo describes how LISP solves the
> traffic optimization issues caused by a mobility event of an end host
> like a Virtual Machine, as it decouples the identity of the end host
> from its location, such that traffic will always be forwarded to the
> correct location. More-over the LISP control plane can be leveraged
> to discover and distribute the reachability information of end hosts
> such that end to end broadcast domains, and their associated
> problems, are no longer needed.
>
> Various sub-use cases will be looked at in this draft, depending on
> whether mobility is achieved at L2 (using MAC-addresses as EID) or at
> L3 (using IP addresses as EIDs), and whether subnets are L2 extended
> across LISP sites or not. This memo also describes how to handle
> mobility in the case where the default gateway of the end host is not
> capable of performing the LISP map-and-encap function, while the LISP
> xTR function is located one or more L3 hops away from the default
> gateway.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>submission
>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
>The IETF Secretariat
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
