Hi Albert,
LISP solves one part of the TE problem. That is, it allows the ITR to choose
the ETR through which traffic enters the destination LISP site. However, it
doesn't determine the path that traffic takes between IETR and ETR. So, it that
sense, LISP TE is different from traffic engineering with MPLS.
Also, I am not sure that it is *always* a good idea to let the ITR choose the
ETR through which traffic enters the destination LISP site. A discussion of
when this is and isn't a good idea might be appropriate in the intro document.
Ron
> > - Section 7.3 needs to be rethought. LISP doesn't provide TE, in the same
> sense that MPLS does. It's quite different.
> >
>
> RFC6830 states that LISP offers TE.
>
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
