Dino,
Exactly! The Intro doc needs text that is a) easy to parse and b) technically
correct. This will certainly be more coarse that the definition in 6830, but
probably a little more verbose than what we have already proposed.
Ron
>
> Let's have descriptions where they are needed and formal definitions in the
> specs that were already published. And we should have the intro document
> make the descriptions more coarser than the technical definitions in the
> specs. Agree?
>
> Dino
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
