Hello,

This is definitely something interesting and that is worth discussing in this 
document!

Damien Saucez 

On 29 Sep 2014, at 19:01, Sharon <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Damian, our experience applying the lisp architecture is focused on 
> service providers network under the umbrella of what we call Lisp Flow 
> Mapping - Subscriber to Services .
> Is this domain of interest to your impact document? 

> If so will be happy to help.
> 
> 
> The Lisp Flow Mapping use cases fall into two main blocks:
> (1) Consumer Services and (2) Managed Network Services
> 
> In the Consumer use cases the Lisp architecture addresses the need to 
> distribute the "anchors" used by carriers to pin subscriber inline services - 
> mobility services, value add services, media services..
> Context is pervasive using mapping, flows are mapped to wherever anchors & 
> states are. 
> 
> In Managed network services the Lisp architecture is used to augment 
> deficiencies in VPNs for supporting virtualization, hosting, and broadband 
> access. CEs are freed from enterprise prefixes and WAN functions, PEs are 
> freed from running per enterprise routing, and Ps are freed from per location 
> LSPs. 
> 
> Please let  know if the above is of interest and in charter so we can perhaps 
> incorporate.
> 
> 
> --szb
> 
>> On Sep 29, 2014, at 04:28, Damien Saucez <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> The charter makes a clear distinction between the LISP architecture and its
>> impact (see charter excerpt below) so we would greatly appreciate to have
>> feedback on draft-saucez-lisp-impact-06 that aims at summarising what are
>> the potential implications of a LISP deployment in today’s Internet. This 
>> draft
>> can be seen somehow as a companion of the -intro- document that focuses
>> on the architecture and mechanisms.
>> 
>> Thank you for you collaboration,
>> 
>> Damien Saucez 
>> 
>> 
>> - Architecture description: This document will describe the
>> architecture of the entire LISP system, making it easier to read the
>> rest of the LISP specifications and providing a basis for discussion
>> about the details of the LISP protocols. The document will include
>> a description of the cache management and ETR synchronization
>> essential characteristics needed to ensure the correct operation
>> of the protocol.
>> 
>> - A description of the impacts of LISP: This document will describe
>> the problems that LISP is intended to address and the impacts that
>> employing LISP has. While the work on LISP was initiated by Internet
>> routing scaling concerns, there has also been an interest on
>> improved solutions to a number of different problems, such as
>> traffic engineering. This document should describe problem areas
>> (such as scaling or traffic engineer) where LISP is expected to have
>> a positive effect, as well as any tradeoffs that are caused by
>> LISP's design.
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-saucez-lisp-impact-06.txt
>>> Date: 29 Sep 2014 13:21:29 GMT+2
>>> To: "Damien Saucez" <[email protected]>, "Luigi Iannone" 
>>> <[email protected]>, Florin Coras <[email protected]>, 
>>> Damien Saucez <[email protected]>, Luigi Iannone 
>>> <[email protected]>, "Florin Coras" <[email protected]>, 
>>> Albert Cabellos <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-saucez-lisp-impact-06.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Damien Saucez and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>> 
>>> Name:        draft-saucez-lisp-impact
>>> Revision:    06
>>> Title:        LISP Impact
>>> Document date:    2014-09-29
>>> Group:        Individual Submission
>>> Pages:        15
>>> URL:            
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-06.txt
>>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saucez-lisp-impact/
>>> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-06
>>> Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-saucez-lisp-impact-06
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>> The Locator/Identifier Separation Protocol (LISP) aims at improving
>>> the Internet scalability properties leveraging on three simple
>>> principles: address role separation, encapsulation, and mapping.  In
>>> this document, based on implementation, deployment, and theoretical
>>> studies, we discuss the impact that deployment of LISP can have on
>>> both the Internet in general and for the end-users in particular.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>> 
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to