+1 it’s been deployed for several years and very stable (and simple to work with). I support this going to last call.
On Jan 29, 2015, at 11:12 AM, Lori Jakab <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/24/2015 12:39 AM, Fabio Maino wrote: >> Agree. It was recently refreshed from expiration, and I believe it's >> ready for last call. > > +1 > > There are several implementations, that have been thoroughly tested for > interoperability, so I support this document going into working group > last call. > > -Lori > >> >> Fabio >> >> On 1/23/15 9:25 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote: >>> I would like to ask the working group if there are any issues with >>> draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02 and if there is any reason to not send this >>> document for working group last call? >>> >>> It has been around for a while, has good implementation and deployment >>> support and hasn't been presented in a working group meeting for a while. >>> >>> Dino >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lisp mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp Best regards, Gregg -------------------------------------------------------------------- .:|:.:|:. | gregg schudel (ccie#9591) LISP technical marketing engr cisco | mobile: +1 571 332 2222 email: [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------- cisco corporate legal statement: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
