On Mar 9, 2015, at 7:07 AM, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 2/6/15 12:58 PM, Gregg Schudel (gschudel) wrote: >> >> On Feb 6, 2015, at 7:44 AM, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It turns out that the discussion during review was with the upper limit. >>> I can't find any reference to discussions on the lower limit. Authors? >> >> going back to check Brian - it was a while ago. > > Have we gotten anywhere with this check? The erratum is sitting in a > less-than-useful state at this point. my apologies Brian - i’d totally forgotten this one. thanks for the (gentle :) reminder ! > > Regards, > Brian Best regards, Gregg -------------------------------------------------------------------- .:|:.:|:. | gregg schudel (ccie#9591) LISP technical marketing engr cisco | mobile: +1 571 332 2222 email: [email protected] -------------------------------------------------------------------- cisco corporate legal statement: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
