On Apr 8, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Ross Callon <[email protected]> wrote:
> My understanding of this is that what some service providers do today is to > announce some more specific prefixes (that match a PA prefix assigned to > them) at some interconnection points and some different more specific > prefixes at other interconnection points in order to draw in traffic where > they want to draw it in. If with LISP you were to map all of these prefixes > in one mapping table entry then you would be mapping them all to the same > RLOC (or set of RLOCs). This is not correct, there is no requirement for an ETR to provide the same answer to one requesting ITR as it does another. Quite the opposite, replies can be customized depending on many possible variables. -Darrel _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
