Hi,
As previously said, "use case” might not be the best term, and
as Darrel Lewis suggested during the meeting in Prague,
the WG should be careful not to create tight constraints by
binding the protocol to narrow use cases.
Yet, it is always good to have an idea of where the technology we are
designing will be used. This will as well may help in taking some decisions
along the way.
There is no predefined suggestion, but a good starting point for discussion
is the list provided by Fabio Maino in his mail:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg05996.html
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg05996.html>
- LISP VPN (including integration with IPsec)
- NVO3 use case for DC virtualization (including support for VM mobility)
- SDN/NFV (including support for service chaining)
- IoT (LISP as connecting infrastructure for IoT applications)
- Mobile Node (LISP-MN mobility)
Please send your feedback to which area should have priority.
Joel & Luigi
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
