The following errata report has been verified for RFC7052,
"Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) MIB". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7052&eid=4256

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Isidor Kouvelas <[email protected]>
Date Reported: 2015-02-04
Verified by: Brian Haberman (IESG)

Section: 7

Original Text
-------------
    REFERENCE
        "RFC 6830, Section 14.2 and
         LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF), Work in Progress,
         March 2013."
    SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (5..39))


Corrected Text
--------------
    REFERENCE
        "RFC 6830, Section 14.2 and
         LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF), Work in Progress,
         March 2013."
    SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..39))


Notes
-----
The minimum octet string length of 5 specified for the LispAddressType is 
incorrect. The smallest non-empty address is an IPv4 address that is not using 
the LCAF format to include an instance ID. This requires 8 octets (see example 
1 above keeping in mind that the AFI requires 2 octets). However, in many 
places in the MIB definition the LispAddressType is used as the type for 
attributes where “unspecified” is a valid return. For example in 
lispEidRegistrationLastRegisterSender, an EID prefix that is configured on a 
Map-Server may not have any active registrations. To encode the absence of an 
address the minimum length of zero should be allowed.

--------------------------------------
RFC7052 (draft-ietf-lisp-mib-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) MIB
Publication Date    : October 2013
Author(s)           : G. Schudel, A. Jain, V. Moreno
Category            : EXPERIMENTAL
Source              : Locator/ID Separation Protocol INT
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to