Agreed. My concerns in the LCAF aspects revolve around EID usage. RLOC
usage is, as you say, understandable.
Yours,
joel
On 10/15/15 11:26 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
I am really unclear as to what the problem being addressed by creating a
programmatic language for LCAFs is. Heck, I am confused by what the JSON LCAFs
are solving too.
At this point in time, it is not clear to me how the JSON LCAF would be used as
an EID-record. However, returning a JSON dictionary array as output of a lookup
(an RLOC-record), is quite useful. Doing that latter requires no mapping system
changes. Doing the former would require a major change IMO.
Dino
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
