Hi Terry, thanks for the comments. > On 20 Oct 2015, at 10:47, Terry Manderson <[email protected]> wrote: >
[snip] > I have two suggestions. > >> From the introduction "The main goal of LISP is to make the routing > infrastructure.." please consider s/is/was/ given the tone of the rest of > the document and the discussions underway regarding the WG. > Yes, it make sense to make such a change. > Section 2, second paragraph "Provider (interdomain) Aggregatable"; I > think "interdomain" is superfluous here. > Will be delete in the next revision. Thanks Luigi > Thanks > Terry > > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
