Hi Spencer, > On 22 Oct 2015, at 14:11, Spencer Dawkins at IETF > <[email protected]> wrote: >
[snip] > What is we out the following text: > > “Addresses are separated in two sets that have different semantics > meanings” > > Would that work? > > Ah, I see - you weren't making the point I thought you were making. Your > explanation was actually better than your proposed text, because it said > "address SPACE", not just addresses. Perhaps "The address space is divided > into two sets that have different semantic meanings"? > Looks pretty good to me. Thanks. > > > [snip] > Middle boxes/filters: because of encapsulation or encryption, the middle > boxes may > not understand the traffic, which can cause them to drop > legitimate packets ([RFC7258]). > > Would that work? > > One of the nice security ADs may have a better read on this, but I'm thinking > the point of citing RFC 7258 is that middleboxes being clueless will be > increasingly common. Perhaps > > Middle boxes/filters: because of increasingly common encryption as a > response to pervasive monitoring ([RFC7258]), middle boxes are increasingly > likely to be unable to understand encapsulated traffic, which can cause them > to drop legitimate packets. > Looks awesome to me. I’ll this text. If any security ADs has further comments they are always welcome ciao L.
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
