Hi Med, On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:48 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Alberto, > > > > Thank you for sharing the slides and also for including > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-lisp-subscribe/ in your > analysis. > My pleasure, the draft was really relevant. > > > With regards to draft-boucadair-*, I would like to mention that we went > for that design because we don’t want to overload existing primitives with > new functionalities that are specific to subscription. I do see a value in > having dedicated methods for achieving that functionality. > Absolutely, that's something worth discussing. Hopefully we'll have some time to go over this in Japan. Best, Alberto > > > Cheers, > > Med > > > > *De :* lisp [mailto:[email protected]] *De la part de* Alberto > Rodriguez-Natal > *Envoyé :* mercredi 30 septembre 2015 23:44 > *À :* [email protected] list > *Objet :* [lisp] LISP subscription > > > > Hi all, > > As you may know, some of us have been talking for a while about different > approaches to support subscription in LISP. On the attached slides you can > find a summary of our thoughts on the topic. > > We hope they can help to trigger a wider discussion within the WG. If time > allows, we can present them at Yokohama. > > Thanks, > > Alberto >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
