Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: Block
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BLOCK: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for formulating a proposal for LISP work to continue to next step(s). The results will be interesting, and there's a group of people interested in doing the work. The basics of the proposed charter seem good; learn from the experience and take what worked well into PS, ditch the not-so-well-worked parts, and continue some part of the work as experimental until we have more experience of it. I will support a new charter for the working group, but first I have a question that I want discuss. I do think though that we should talk about the scoping of the charter. It is quite imprecise with respect to what will be on standards track and what is not. Could that or the process leading to that decision be clarified? Or am I missing something on this late hour when I read the charter? For instance, consider taking to PS things that we have published as RFCs before (possibly modified). _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
