On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This document describes a set of guidelines that will be used in an > experiment. Why is it not an Experimental document? [I may have missed > the discussion in the archive.]
That's a good question. This document is the management part extracted from the other draft so it copied the status from the other document. I guess the question is if both should change status to Experimental or if they're fine as they are? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > In the request template, the dates should match the ones in > draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block: 2018 instead of 2017 and 2021 instead of 2020. They've been edited at different times, and it is a 3year experiment so the date will have to be adjusted in both document if they're approved, before they can be published. Other document is draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE [email protected] | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | [email protected] _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
