On 2/16/16, 5:33 AM, "Luigi Iannone" <g...@gigix.net> wrote:
Luigi: Hi! ... > >> Along the same lines, the conditions for the experiment to be successful >> and the IETF to consider whether to transform the prefix into a >>permanent >> assignment (Section 6. 3+3 Allocation Plan) are not defined. How >>should >> this decision be made? How will the IETF know the experiment is >> successful? >> > >This is normal IETF process. LISP WG has to discuss whether or not a >permanent allocation is needed. I think it is fine if the lisp WG has the discussion and we go from there. I still think there should be some indication of what is success. Is it related to the number of allocations made by RIPE? Is it related to the advertisement of those allocations? The use of those allocation in production? All/none of the above? IOW, if the WG is going to have a discussion about whether to continue or not, there should be some criteria to consider. Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
