Hi Ben, On 2/17/16 4:08 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I share Alvaro's thought that this should be experimental. (And if not > that, then a BCP).
We can talk about Informational vs. Experimental on the call, but... I don't see how this could possibly be a BCP. This is guidance for the management of one block of addresses that is being used by one protocol, so BCP seems out of line. Regards, Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
