Hi, While reviewing draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-12 I realized that if we want instance-id support for other LCAF types then we must support recursive LCAFs, i.e., use Type 2 and within it store the type we’re interested in. Wouldn’t it be better to have the instance-id value and mask part of the LCAF header? Apart from simplifying processing on xTR side, this would also help avoid having other types, like Type 9, define their own instace-id fields.
Thanks, Florin _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
