DDT went already through WG last call. We are waiting an update fixing editorial issues that I spotted as shepherd of the document.
Once this step is done, the document will go forward. ciao L. > On 22 Apr 2016, at 23:07, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > > And the same for LISP-DDT. Can I request last call for it? > > Dino > > On Apr 22, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Fabio Maino <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> This draft has been around for quite some time, and went through multiple >> reviews and editing cycles. >> >> I support handing it to the AD. >> >> Thanks, >> Fabio >> >> On 4/8/16 6:27 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> During our meeting yesterday, the authors of the LISP LCAF document >>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-12 >>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-12>] >>> asked for Last Call. The room showed consensus and no objections were >>> raised. >>> >>> This email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end April 22nd, 2016. >>> >>> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is >>> ready for handing to the AD. >>> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it >>> would take to address your concerns. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Luigi & Joel >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lisp mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp> > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
