Hi again, Anton.

I have just uploaded a new presentation including more ideas and also a section 
about backward compatibility:

http://es.slideshare.net/josemariasaldana/header-compression-and-multiplexing-in-lisp

BR and thanks,

Jose

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Anton Smirnov [mailto:[email protected]]
> Enviado el: jueves, 23 de junio de 2016 17:54
> Para: Jose Saldana <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> CC: 'José Ruiz Mas' <[email protected]>
> Asunto: Re: [lisp] Bandwidth savings with LISP
> 
>     Hi Jose,
>     there is a theoretical aspect of the work (it's curious) and then there 
> is a practical
> one. For the latter one - section "Backward compatibility" is conspicuously 
> missing
> from the document. On the first glance, it looks like backward compatibility 
> of the
> solution was not investigated. Is this correct?
> 
> Anton
> 
> 
> On 06/23/2016 11:11 AM, Jose Saldana wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As you may know, we recently submitted a draft
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saldana-lisp-compress-mux/) with a 
> proposal
> allowing bandwidth and pps reductions.
> >
> > The idea is to send together a number of small packets, which are in the 
> > buffer of
> an ITR and have the same ETR as destination, into a single packet. Therefore, 
> they
> will share a single LISP header. And this can be combined with ROHC (header
> compression).
> >
> > We have a running implementation, based on LISPMob
> > (https://github.com/Simplemux/lispmob-with-simplemux), which we have
> > used to run some tests
> >
> > This is a summary of the results.
> >
> > - When small packets (100 bytes) are sent, up to 63% of throughput increase 
> > can
> be observed (in our example, we pass from 550kbps to 910kbps).
> >
> > - In the case of securing the LISP tunnel with IPSec, the increase can be 
> > 935
> (from 470kbps to 870kbps).
> >
> > You can find more detailed information in this presentation:
> > http://es.slideshare.net/josemariasaldana/header-compression-and-multi
> > plexing-in-lisp
> >
> > Your feedback will be highly appreciated.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > The authors
> >
> >> -----Mensaje original-----
> >> De: lisp [mailto:[email protected]] En nombre de Jose Saldana
> >> Enviado el: miércoles, 04 de mayo de 2016 18:41
> >> Para: [email protected]
> >> CC: 'Jose Ruiz Mas' <[email protected]>
> >> Asunto: [lisp] New draft posted:
> >> draft-saldana-lisp-compress-mux-00.txt
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> We have just posted this draft
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saldana-lisp-
> >> compress-mux/.
> >>
> >>                Header compression and multiplexing in LISP
> >>                     draft-saldana-lisp-compress-mux-00
> >>
> >> Abstract
> >>
> >>     When small payloads are transmitted through a packet-switched
> >>     network, the resulting overhead may result significant.  This is
> >>     stressed in the case of LISP, where a number of headers are prepended
> >>     to a packet, as new headers have to be added to each packet.
> >>
> >>     This document proposes to send together a number of small packets,
> >>     which are in the buffer of a ITR, having the same ETR as destination,
> >>     into a single packet.  Therefore, they will share a single LISP
> >>     header, and therefore bandwidth savings can be obtained, and a
> >>     reduction in the overall number of packets sent to the network can be
> >>     achieved.
> >>
> >> A running implementation can be found here:
> >> https://github.com/Simplemux/lispmob-with-simplemux. I has been built
> >> as a fork of lispmob.
> >>
> >> The idea is very similar to what was published in this paper:
> >> http://diec.unizar.es/~jsaldana/personal/budapest_ICC_2013_in_proc.pd
> >> f
> >>
> >> Your feedback about the draft will be appreciated.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >>
> >> Jose Saldana
> >> Julián Fernández Navajas
> >> José Ruiz Mas
> >>
> >>> -----Mensaje original-----
> >>> De: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>> Enviado
> >>> el: miércoles, 04 de mayo de 2016 18:20
> >>> Para: Jose Ruiz Mas <[email protected]>; Jose Saldana
> >>> <[email protected]>; Julian Fernandez Navajas <[email protected]>
> >>> Asunto: New Version Notification for
> >>> draft-saldana-lisp-compress-mux-00.txt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> A new version of I-D, draft-saldana-lisp-compress-mux-00.txt
> >>> has been successfully submitted by Jose Saldana and posted to the
> >>> IETF repository.
> >>>
> >>> Name:             draft-saldana-lisp-compress-mux
> >>> Revision: 00
> >>> Title:            Header compression and multiplexing in LISP
> >>> Document date:    2016-05-04
> >>> Group:            Individual Submission
> >>> Pages:            8
> >>> URL:
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saldana-lisp-compress-mux
> >>> -
> >>> 00.txt
> >>> Status:
> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saldana-lisp-compress-mux/
> >>> Htmlized:
> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saldana-lisp-compress-mux-00
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Abstract:
> >>>     When small payloads are transmitted through a packet-switched
> >>>     network, the resulting overhead may result significant.  This is
> >>>     stressed in the case of LISP, where a number of headers are prepended
> >>>     to a packet, as new headers have to be added to each packet.
> >>>
> >>>     This document proposes to send together a number of small packets,
> >>>     which are in the buffer of a ITR, having the same ETR as destination,
> >>>     into a single packet.  Therefore, they will share a single LISP
> >>>     header, and therefore bandwidth savings can be obtained, and a
> >>>     reduction in the overall number of packets sent to the network can be
> >>>     achieved.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> >>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> >>> tools.ietf.org.
> >>>
> >>> The IETF Secretariat
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lisp mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lisp mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> >

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to