It is relevant. I talked to the authors today. We want to merge both features. Their feature of having centimeter granularity and our feature of having a radius for geo-prefixes.
I will report on this during my presentation. Thanks Joel, Dino > On Jul 20, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is relevant to the geo-loc tagging in the LCAF draft, and I believe it > is relevant to one of Dino's drafts. > > Yours, > Joel > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: [Isis-wg] more knowledge about including location in protocols > Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:31:27 -0400 > From: Alia Atlas <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > CC: Alissa Cooper <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > > I spoke briefly with Alissa. The WG I was thinking of is geopriv, which has > closed, > but the mailing list ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) would still > be useful. > > I believe that RFC 7459 "Representation of Uncertainty and Confidence in the > Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)" may be useful > reading. > > Regards, > Alia > <Attached Message Part.txt>_______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
