Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-ddt/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 6.4.1: RSA-SHA1 is not the right choice today, shouldn't this be RSA-SHA256? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - 6.4.1: Can you clarify what bits are signed? I'm not quite sure from the description given - you can have more than one signature but you say the the "entire record" is covered. - Section 8: Where's signature validation in the pseudo-code? _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
