On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In section 5 of draft-padma-ideas-problem-statement, there is a section > in the table which specifically discuss about the structure of IDs and > whether we should used them for specific classes or as the Network Mapping > system is proposing to attach metadata to ID. > > Maybe we can experiment with the EID-prefix block 2001:5::/32 from RFC > 7954/7955 to allocate sub-blocks from large regions of the world. Yes, > geographical allocations without the issue of the past, since EIDs are not > injected into the underlay routing and are not based on Internet topology. > > Do this first and then decide which, say continent block is registered to > a regional mapping system. And if an ID needs to register to multiple > mapping systems. The mapping systems should considered to be relatively > local in scope and may overlap. > > This could help mitigate DoS attacks to a smaller (but still scalable) > part of the infrastructure. > <Padma> Agree. Thanks Padma > > Dino > >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
