> I was looking into the procedures to request a LCAF type and realized that > there seems to be two LCAF registries on IANA: 'LISP Address Type' [1] and > 'LISP LCAF Type' [2]. One is defined by RFC6830 [3] and the other by > draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf [4]. The problem is that they define different > allocation mechanisms (FCFS vs specification required) for the second half of > the LCAF space (128-255). Why do we keep two and which one is the > authoritative registry? My guess is that 'LISP Address Type' should be > overridden by 'LISP LCAF Type' but wanted to check with the WG. Sorry if this > has been pointed out before and I missed the discussion.
Well it really is FCFS after a specification has been written. There is really is only one registry. They just were called different names. We can fix this in RFC6830bis/RFC6833bis. And when we do that update these bis RFCs we can point them to RFC8060 (the LCAF to be RFC soon). Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
