> It looks to me like Policy_Denied and Authentication-Failure are error codes, > not dispositions. They presumably go with the "Drop" action (as is the > defined behavior for any ACT which is not understood.
Sure, we could name each of them: Drop - no reason Drop - policy-denied Drop - authentication-failure Would that be better? > Given that the action is the same as Drop, it seems safe, but odd, to use > different action codes. Is there a difference in the action at the receiver? No, not really. > If there is no difference, would it not make sense to encode this information > in some other field? It seems to be for diagnositirc purposes, not action. What about above? Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
