This is my formal/obvious vote to move the document forward. -v
> On Mar 27, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > > Victor and I (co-authors) believe this should be moved to IESG review. That > might be obvious, but if the authors don’t vote . . . ;-) > > Dino > >> On Mar 27, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> the chairs did not receive any feedback concerning this call. >> >> Remember that silence is not consensus. >> >> We extend the WG Last Call until next Monday April 3rd, 2017. >> >> Please speak up. >> >> Luigi & Joel >> >>> On 11 Mar 2017, at 10:22, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> The authors of the LISP-Signal-Free-Multicast document >>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-02] >>> asked for WG Last Call. >>> >>> This email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end March 27th, >>> 2017. >>> >>> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is >>> ready for handing to the AD. >>> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it >>> would take to address your concerns. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Luigi & Joel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
