Hi Dino,

This is better. Thanks.

I would remove the “Not Assigned” from the table because your introduction text 
is about “codes assigned by this document”.
I would add a note for asking IANA to formally assign type 5.

BTW, did you considered to use type code 4 for both Map-Notify and 
Map-Notify-Ack given that both messages have the same format and content? This 
is doable by using a reserved bit as follows:

OLD:

        0                   1                   2                   3
        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
       |Type=4/5|             Reserved                 | Record Count  |
       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

NEW:


        0                   1                   2                   3

        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

       |Type=4 |A|            Reserved                 | Record Count  |

       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


A (Ack-bit): MUST be set to 0 for Map-Notify and to 1 for Map-Notify-Ack.



Cheers,

Med

De : Dino Farinacci [mailto:[email protected]]
Envoyé : mercredi 3 mai 2017 02:34
À : Joel M. Halpern
Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; [email protected] list
Objet : Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-03.txt

> Top commenting on a few of the points, as co-chair.
>
> 1) With regard to LISP-DDT, the allocation issue has been resolved with the 
> help of the document authors, IANA, our AD, and the RPC staff. Formally, we 
> have made an early allocation for the code point DDT needs.  This gives us 
> two years to get DDT onto the standards track.

Thanks.

> 2) My recommendation regarding the NAT Traversal would be to leave the 
> Info_Request / Info_Reply to the NAT Traversal document.  We can use the 
> early allocation approach there if we still deem NAT traversal as 
> experimental when we finish it.

I’ll remove it.

> 3) As far as I can tell, having this document update the references for the 
> IANA table seems to be both appropriate and useful.

Agree. See new version enclosed. I made the requested changes that Med wanted. 
Please comment Med.

Dino


_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to