> On Sep 19, 2017, at 9:19 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> That sounds reasonable Joel. We will work on an extended description and get 
> back to the list.

The big question is if the pubsub draft should be referenced from 6833bis?

Has the same issues as referencing the NAT-traversal draft. 

Dino
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to