LISP, I've pulled this document off the upcoming telechat and returned it to the working group after talking with your Chairs and the Authors. We had an OPS-DIR review which questioned why we don't take this document standards-track. But as it has references to 6830 and 6833, it can not be PS. But when the bis documents are done, we may then have difficulties as this one is Experimental.
The bis documents are making excellent progress, so we'll progress all three documents together as PS. This will let us have the flexibility to handle the DIR reviewers/IESG comments by determining which document is more appropriate. Thanks and keep up the progress on the bis documents! Deborah > -----Original Message----- > From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 4:56 PM > To: Luigi Iannone <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; > BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-lisp-sec-13.txt> > > IESG state changed: > > New State: AD is watching::Revised I-D Needed > > (The previous state was Waiting for Writeup) > > Will revise to PS track. > > Datatracker URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dlisp-2Dsec_&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ- > o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=6UhGpW9lwi9dM7jYlxXD8w&m=kubnrDaz92F5lj2aAT > gQnPsd7F3226nw_pqQ87l1Jzo&s=vvJ3q46zyWehk5CYrUiBZutGe3xmRpxgwkjk > MGfacdo&e= _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
