Hi,
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 19:22, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > [snip] > As you can see there is a lot of text that would need to be written. Which I > think is too late for RFC6833bis. Why late? Dino, as you mentioned in your previous mail if we want to provide specification for this use than now is the time. Otherwise we have to state that the current specification does not provide anything about multiple records and hence they shouldn’t be used. Up to the WG to decide whether or not is the time to do it. Ciao L. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
