> registration protocol, that might be orthogonal to other transport-related > mechanisms. In my experience this has proved to be very effective in > scalability of large LISP deployments, especially with the increased volume > of registration data.
I agree it’s a point solution for registration. Then why did you need to have a general format. I could support this draft if it was simplified to spec how to use Map-Registers in TCP and nothing more. The only thing I would add is how to use TLS so encryption is supported. More and more requirements are coming up for protecting the privacy of location information. And since Map-Registers carry RLOCs (and potential Geo-Coordnates) that information needs to be protected. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
