I think it is a good plan. Thanks. Dino
> On May 15, 2018, at 7:19 AM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > > Luigi notied that there is one more document that our PS set depends on. > RFC 6834: Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Map-Versioning > > Since we will need to move this to PS, the rules prohibit us from simply > doing a downref. > > As such, unless our AD tells us we can't expedite this, the plan is: > > Luigi will prepare draft-iannone-lisp-rfc6834bis. > > As soon as he posts it, I will issue a 4 week joint adoption and last call. > We think this one is dead simple and as such there will be no problems with > it. > > -- We will need to see strong support from the working group for advancing > it. > -- small errors can be fixed as part of this > -- If someone has problems with our doing this, they can object and we will > slow it all down. In particular, if there turn out to be hard spots where it > is not technically simple, then we have to slow down and do it right. > > Assuming it completes the 4 week call without issues, Luigi will issue any > necessary revisions, I will do a shepherd writeup, and we will add it to the > stack of things being advanced. > > If someone sees a problem with this plan, please speak up. > Yours, > Joel > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
