I support handing this document to the AD.
It's pretty straightforward, and I'm aware of implementations that plan
to take advantage of this feature.
Fabio
On 7/6/18 6:06 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
Folks,
As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus
to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
[https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (after
the few fixes that I asked).
Fixes are done, hence, this email starts the usual two weeks WG Last
Call, to end July 20th, 2018.
Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that
it is ready for handing to the AD.
If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain
what it would take to address your concerns.
Thanks
Luigi & Joel
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
