Hi Dino, > On 13 Sep 2018, at 00:03, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Actually I brought this up because there were more cases where I found that >> ALT knowledge is needed. If you don’t want this to be a normative reference >> and remove the sentence above (which I’m not sure is helpful), please also >> double-check all other occurrences of ALT and make sure the discussed case >> is also understandable without ALT knowledge. >
I disagree on the approach. IMO it makes more sense to me that this document describes just the Map-Server/Map-Resolver front end. How the front-end works with the actual mapping system is a matter of the specific mapping system. In other words, how Map-Server/Map-Resolver works with LISP-DDT should be in the LISP-DDT document. Ditto for LISP+ALT. > I think it should left in and we should add LISP-DDT to the paragraph. Since > the two mapping transport systems that have moved forward to RFC are ALT and > DDT. And I believe they should both be Normative References. > This means two downrefs. We will need to move them to PS. I really do not see the need for this but YMMV. Ciao L. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
