It doesn’t make semantic sense to have anycast addresses for ITRs since they are sender/encapsulators and nothing gets sent to them as a service discovery entity. However, obviously, an xTR, is both a co-located ITR and ETR, in which case, an anycast RLOC be assigned to it (the ETR part of it).
Dino > On Sep 17, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Rene 'Renne' Bartsch, B.Sc. Informatics > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Am 17.09.18 um 18:04 schrieb Dino Farinacci: >> Also from Renne/Darrel comments about anycast addressing for ETRs. Reworded >> some of that paragraph. > > Great! > > Did I miss implicit statements about anycast addresses of map-servers and > ITRs or is there no rule? > > Regards, > > Renne > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
